Free Bitcoin Mining 356 GPU Bitcoin Mining Cloud Mining

Ravencoin Open Developer Meeting - 1/4/2019

[14:04] Hi everyone! [14:04] :dabbitwave: [14:04] Hey Everybody! [14:04] Hello 😃 [14:04] Sorry we're getting started a bit late. [14:04] Topics: SLC Meetup (March 15th) [14:04] 👋 [14:04] Roadmap breakdown - posted to github [14:05] IPFS (integration) [14:05] greetings 👋 [14:05] So, SLC Meetup on the 15th! [14:05] Great! [14:05] Hi! [14:06] Hi all — a special thanks to the developers and congratulations on an amazing first year!!! # [14:06] <[Dev] Blondfrogs> Hello Everyone! [14:07] We have a tentative agenda with @Tron , @corby speaking. [14:08] We would like to have nice walkthrough of the Raven DevKit for the meetup. [14:08] We are planning on hosting a meetup in SLC at the Overstock building on March 15th from 6:00pm-9:00pm. It is free admission, but there is a page on meetup.com where people can rsvp so that we have a somewhat accurate headcount for food. [14:08] sup guys [14:08] hey russ [14:09] We are planning on having a few speakers and have allotted a bit of time at the end for people to meet and greet each other. [14:09] can you guys link us to the page somewhere when thats available? 😄 [14:10] free food?! [14:10] todays topic? [14:10] yeah can we indicate pepperoni pizza [14:10] Sounds good to me @Jeroz Nothing ordered yet though. 😃 [14:10] only pepperoni pizza is served at true blockchain meetings right [14:10] :blobhide: [14:10] Absolutely. The itinerary just needs to be finalized and then I'll make a broad post about the rest of the details. [14:11] https://www.meetup.com/Salt-Lake-City-salt-lake-city-Meetup/ [14:11] 😭 so far away [14:11] West Coast! [14:11] @MTarget But there's pizza, so worth the travel time. [14:11] lol [14:12] I'll be watching the stream if its available since i'm from montreal/canada 😛 [14:12] Ah yes, I love $300 pizza 😉 [14:12] as long as I get to see your smiling faces @Tron @RavencoinDev then it's worth the time [14:12] We'll be there. [14:12] We'll be messaging additional details as they get finalized. [14:12] Greeting and salutations! [14:12] sup [14:13] Hey, $300 is considerably cheaper than 2 $3,700,000 pizzas. [14:14] Ok, switching topics... [14:14] yeah its a way to fly, [14:14] question is whether those piza's will be paid for in RVN coin or not :ThinkBlack: [14:14] Roadmap [14:14] It hasn't changed, just added some detail. [14:14] https://github.com/RavenProject/Ravencoin/tree/masteroadmap [14:15] nice [14:15] This now links to a breakdown for messaging, voting, anti-spam, and rewards (dividends) [14:15] will there be any additional RPC functionality coming in the future, thinking in terms of some functions that are only available in ravencore-lib [14:15] apologies if now is not time to ask questions, i can wait for later [14:15] "Phase 7 - Compatibility Mode" - that's new 😮 [14:15] The protocol for messaging is pretty well established, but the rest isn't in stone (code) yet. [14:16] can you give us details on compatibility mode? [14:16] In broad brush strokes. [14:17] The idea is to allow ravend to act as a daemon that looks like a single coin. [14:17] so ravend that only works with the bitcoin asset? [14:18] interesting [14:19] So you start it with an option to only work with a single asset/token account or something? [14:19] hmm compelling what is the reason for this? some kind of scale or performance? [14:19] ^ [14:19] Example: Configure ravend to listen for transfer RPC call for senttoaddress or sendfrom, but for a specific asset. This would allow easy integration into existing system for assets. [14:20] Only the daemon or the whole wallet UI? [14:20] yeah thats great, rpc functions dont allow us to do this yet, if i recall [14:20] or at least we depend more on ravencore lib [14:20] so like asset zmq [14:20] that's smart [14:20] @Tron it also sounds like it makes our life easier working with RPC, instead of core all the time for some functionality [14:21] if i understand correctly anyways [14:21] So you could run numerous instances of ravend each on their own network and RPC port, each configured for a different asset. You would need some balance of RVN in each one to cover transaction fees, then. [14:21] id be curious to know what all the advantages are of this [14:21] one more question, how would i decentralize the gateway between bitcoin mainnet/ravencoin mainnet? in the current RSK implementation they use a federated gateway, how would we avoid this? [14:21] it sounds neato [14:21] Just the daemon. The alternative is to get exchanges to adapt to our RPC calls for assets. It is easier if it just looks like Bitcoin, Litecoin or RVN to them, but it is really transferring FREE_HUGS [14:22] That makes sense. Should further increased exchange adoption for each asset. [14:22] hmm yeah its just easier for wallet integration because its basically the same as rvn and bitcoin but for a specific asset [14:22] so this is in specific mind of exchange listings for assets i guess [14:23] if i understand rightly [14:23] @traysi Gut feel is to allow ravend to handle a few different assets on different threads. [14:23] Are you going to call it kawmeleon mode? [14:23] Lol [14:23] I read that as kaw-melon mode. [14:24] same lol [14:24] so in one single swoop it possible to create a specific wallet and server daemon for specific assets. great. this makes it easier for exchanges, and has some added advantages with processing data too right? [14:24] Still keeping a RVN balance in the wallet, as well, Tron. How will that work is sendtoaddress sends the token instead of the RVN? A receive-RVN/send tokens-only wallet? [14:25] @traysi Yes [14:25] sendtoaddress on the other port (non RVN port) would send the asset. [14:25] This will be a hugely useful feature. [14:25] ^ [14:26] @Tron currently rpc function not support getaddresses senttowallet and this has to be done in ravencore lib, will this change you propose improve this situation [14:26] Config might look like {"port":2222, "asset":"FREE_HUGS", "rpcuser":"hugger", "rpcpass":"gi3afja33"} [14:26] how will this work cross-chain? [14:28] @push We'd have to go through the rpc calls and work out which ones are supported in compatibility mode. Obviously the mining ones don't apply. And some are generic like getinfo. [14:28] ok cool 👍 cheers [14:29] for now we continue using ravencore lib for our plans to keep track i just wondering if better way [14:29] as we had some issue after realising no rpc function for getting addresses of people who had sent rvn [14:29] @push | ravenland.org all of the node explorer and ravencore-lib functionality is based on RPC (including the addressindex-related calls). Nothing you can't do with RPC, although I'm not sure of the use cases you're referring to.. [14:29] interesting, so ravencore lib is using getrawtransaction somehow [14:29] i thought this may be the case [14:29] that is very useful thankyou for sharing this [14:30] look into addressindex flag and related RPC calls for functions that operate on addresses outside your wallet [14:30] thank you that is very useful, tbh i am not very skilled programmer so just decoding the hex at the raven-cli commandline was a challenge, i shall look more into this, valued information thanks as this was a big ? for us [14:31] Ok, things have gone quiet. New topic. [14:31] IPFS (integration) [14:31] GO [14:33] ... [14:33] <[Dev] Blondfrogs> So, we have been adding ipfs integration into the wallet for messaging. This will allow the wallets to do some pretty sweet stuff. For instance, you will be able to create your ipfs data file for issuing an asset. Push it to ipfs from the wallet, and add the hash right into the issuance data. This is going to allow for a much more seamless flow into the app. [14:34] <[Dev] Blondfrogs> This ofcourse, will also allow for users to create messages, and post them on ipfs and be able to easily and quickly format and send messages out on the network with ipfs data. [14:34] It will also allow optional meta-data with each transaction that goes in IPFS. [14:34] will i be able to view ipfs images natively in the wallet? [14:34] <[Dev] Blondfrogs> Images no [14:34] We discussed the option to disable all IPFS integration also. [14:35] @russ (kb: russkidooski) Probably not. There's some risk to being an image viewer for ANY data. [14:35] No option in wallet to opt into image viewing? [14:35] cool so drag and drop ipfs , if someone wanted to attach an object like an image or a file they could drag drop into ui and it create hash and attach string to transaction command parameters automatically [14:35] We could probably provide a link -- with a warning. [14:35] nomore going to globalupload.io [14:35] :ThinkBlack: [14:35] I understand that the wallet will rely on globalupload.io. (phase 1). Is it not dangerous to rely on an external network? Or am I missing something? [14:36] hmm [14:36] interesting, i suppose you could hash at two different endpoints and compare them [14:36] if you were that worried [14:36] and only submit one to the chain [14:36] You will be able to configure a URL that will be used as an IPFS browser. [14:36] Oh ic [14:36] you wont flood ipfs because only one hash per unique file [14:36] <[Dev] Blondfrogs> There are multiple options for ipfs integration. We are building it so you can run your own ipfs node locally. [14:36] <[Dev] Blondfrogs> or, point it to whatever service you would like. e.g. cloudflare [14:36] this is very cool developments, great to see this [14:37] Just like the external block explorer link currently in preferences. [14:37] @[Dev] Blondfrogs what about a native ipfs swarm for ravencoin only? [14:37] We have discussed that as an option. [14:37] @push | ravenland.org Considering having a fallback of upload through globalupload.io and download through cloudflare. [14:37] <[Dev] Blondfrogs> @russ (kb: russkidooski) We talked about that, but no decisions have been made yet. [14:37] yeah, i would just use two endpoints and strcompare the hash [14:37] as long as they agree good [14:37] submit tran [14:38] else 'potentially mysterious activity' [14:38] ? [14:38] if you submitted the file to ipfs api endpoints [14:38] Will the metadata just be a form with text only fields? [14:39] and then you would get 2 hashes, from 2 independent services [14:39] that way you would not be relying on a central hash service [14:39] and have some means of checking if a returned hash value was intercepted or transformed [14:39] i was answering jeroz' question [14:40] about relying on a single api endpoint for upload ipfs object [14:40] We have also kicked around the idea of hosting our own JSON only IPFS upload/browse service. [14:41] I have a service like this that is simple using php [14:41] we only use it for images right now [14:41] but fairly easy to do [14:41] Yup [14:42] Further questions about IPFS? [14:43] contract handling? file attach handling? or just text fields to generate json? [14:44] trying to get an idea of what the wallet will offer for attaching data [14:44] Probably just text fields that meet the meta-data spec. [14:44] ok noted [14:44] What do you mean by contract handling @sull [14:45] We won't prevent other hashes from being added. [14:45] asset contract (pdf etc) hash etc [14:45] <[Dev] Blondfrogs> also, being able to load from a file [14:45] got it, thanks [14:47] Let's do some general Q&A [14:48] Maybe just a heads up or something to look for in the future but as of right now, it takes roughly 12 hours to sync up the Qt-wallet from scratch. Did a clean installation on my linux PC last night. [14:48] Any plans or discussions related to lack of privacy of asset transfers and the ability to front run when sending to an exchange? [14:48] ^ [14:48] Is there a way to apply to help moderate for example the Telegram / Discord, i spend alot of time on both places, sometimes i pm mods if needed. [14:49] Any developed plans for Asset TX fee adjustment? [14:49] also this^ [14:49] @mxL86 We just created a card on the public board to look into that. [14:49] General remark: https://raven.wiki/wiki/Development#Phase_7_-_Compatible_Mode = updated reflecting Tron's explanation. [14:49] @mxL86 That's a great question. We need to do some profiling and speed it up. I do know that the fix we added from Bitcoin (that saved our bacon) slowed things down. [14:50] Adding to @mxL86 the sync times substantially increased coinciding with the asset layer activation. Please run some internal benchmarks and see where the daemon is wasting all its cycles on each block. We should be able to handle dozens per second but it takes a couple seconds per block. [14:50] @BW__ no plans currently for zk proofs or anything if that's what you're asking [14:50] You are doing a great job. Is there a plan that all this things (IPFS) could be some day implemented in mobile wallet? Or just in QT? [14:50] i notice also that asset transactions had some effect on sync time as we were making a few. Some spikes i not analysed the io and cpu activity properly but will if there is interest [14:51] we are testing some stuff so run into things i am happy to share [14:51] @BW__ Might look at Grin and Beam to see if we can integrate Mimble Wimble -- down the road. [14:51] yeees [14:51] @J. | ravenland.org work with the telegram mods. Not something the developers handle. [14:51] i love you [14:51] @J. | ravenland.org That would be best brought up with the operators/mods of teh telegram channel. [14:51] @corby @Tron thnx [14:51] @S1LVA | GetRavencoin.org we're planning on bumping fees to... something higher! [14:51] no catastrophic failures, just some transaction too smals, and mempool issues so far, still learning [14:52] @corby i thought that this may happen :ThinkBlack: [14:52] @corby x10? 100x? 1000x? Ballpark? [14:52] Definitely ballpark. [14:52] 😃 [14:52] 😂 [14:52] Is a ballpark like a googolplex? [14:53] @push | ravenland.org asset transactions are definitely more expensive to sync [14:53] yes yes they are [14:53] they are also more expensive to make i believe [14:53] 10,000x! [14:53] as some sync process seems to occur before they are done [14:53] @traysi ★★★★★ thanks for the suggestions we are going to be looking at optimizations [14:53] But, it is way slower than we like. Going to look into it. [14:53] i do not understand fully its operation [14:53] 1000x at minimum in my opinion [14:53] its too easy to spam the network [14:54] yes there has been some reports of ahem spam lately [14:54] :blobhide: [14:54] 😉 [14:54] cough cough ravenland [14:54] @russ (kb: russkidooski) we're in agreement -- it's too low [14:54] default fee 0.001 [14:54] ^ something around here [14:54] @corby yep we all are i think [14:55] waaay too low [14:55] meaningful transactions start with meaningful capital expense [14:55] though there is another scenario , there are some larger volume, more objective rich use cases of the chain that would suffer considerably from that [14:55] just worth mentioning, as i have beeen thinking about this a lot [14:55] there are some way around, like i could add 1000 ipfs hashes to a single unique entity, i tested this and it does work [14:56] @russ (kb: russkidooski) What would you suggest. [14:57] I had a PR for fee increase and push back. [14:57] Ignore the push back. 0.001 RVN is not even a micro-farthing in fiat terms [14:57] definitely around 1000x [14:57] Vocal minority for sure [14:57] ^ yep [14:57] @russ (kb: russkidooski) That sounds reasonable. [14:57] Couple hundred Fentons [14:58] right now an asset transaction is 0.01 of a penny essentially [14:58] 1 RVN would work now, but not when RVN is over $1. [14:58] yes exactly [14:58] Hi. Late to the party. [14:58] We are also talking about a min fee. The system will auto-adapt if blocks fill up. [14:58] im thinking tron, some heavy transaction use cases would fall out of utility use if that happened [14:58] so whats the thinking there [14:59] is there a way around the problem, bulked ipfs hash transactions? [14:59] 1000x would put us around btc levels [14:59] maybe a minimum 500x? [14:59] @russ (kb: russkidooski) Agreed. [14:59] <[Dev] Blondfrogs> It is time to wrap it up here. Everyone. Thank you all for your questions and thoughts. We will be back in 2 weeks. 😃 [14:59] Small increase and review. [14:59] Thanks all! [14:59] Cheers. [15:00] yeah sorry for 1 million questions guys hope i didnt take up too much time [15:00] cheers all 👍 [15:00] Thanks everyone [15:00] Thanks everyone for participating!!! [15:00] That is what we are here for [15:00] 100x-500x increase, 1000x maximum [15:00] 🍺

submitted by Chatturga to Ravencoin [link] [comments]

How to Mine BiblePay on Linux

This guide is outdated, please refer to:
https://wiki.biblepay.org/POBH_Setup
https://wiki.biblepay.org/PODC_Setup
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
IMPORTANT - Evolution Upgrade:
Quick Start https://wiki.biblepay.org/Quick_Start
Evolution Upgrade Information https://wiki.biblepay.org/Evolution_Upgrade
Getting Started with Evolution https://wiki.biblepay.org/Getting_Started_with_Evolution
Generic Smart Contracts https://wiki.biblepay.org/Generic_Smart_Contracts
What is BiblePay Evolution? https://www.reddit.com/BiblePay/comments/bifvpk/biblepay_evolution_what_is_it/
Recommend 2GB RAM or can get stuck compiling (if 1GB RAM can use Swap File) Use Ubuntu 16.04
INFO
https://github.com/biblepay/biblepay-evolution/blob/masteBuildBiblePay.txt
INSTALL COMMANDS
apt-get install build-essential libtool autotools-dev automake pkg-config libssl-dev libevent-dev bsdmainutils apt-get install libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-chrono-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-test-dev libboost-thread-dev apt-get install libqt5gui5 libqt5core5a libqt5dbus5 qttools5-dev qttools5-dev-tools libprotobuf-dev protobuf-compiler apt-get install git apt-get install curl build-essential libtool autotools-dev automake pkg-config python3 bsdmainutils cmake sudo add-apt-repository ppa:bitcoin/bitcoin sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install libdb4.8-dev libdb4.8++-dev git clone http://github.com/biblepay/biblepay-evolution prefix=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu cd biblepay-evolution/depends make -j4 # Choose a good -j value, depending on the number of CPU cores available cd .. ./autogen.sh #Note: if echo `pwd` does not return your working directory, replace it with your working directory such as /biblepay-evolution/ ./configure --prefix `pwd`/depends/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu make # See more here: #https://github.com/biblepay/biblepay-evolution/blob/mastedoc/build-unix.md 

SWAP FILE
NOTE: if server is 1GB RAM, before running last command "sudo make", set up a swap file
free #check if swap is 0 dd if=/dev/zero of=/vaswap.img bs=1024k count=1000 mkswap /vaswap.img swapon /vaswap.img free #check if swap is 1024 sudo make 

RUN COMMAND LINE
cd src ./biblepayd -daemon 
OR
RUN GUI
Your GUI program will be located in: /biblepay-evolution/src/qt
./biblepay-qt 
You can also run it in the background (to free up your terminal) if you call it with:
./biblepay-qt & 
To start mining, instructions are the same as for Windows: Go to Tools -> Debug Console
Execute this command (to start mining with 8 threads)
setgenerate true 8 
From there you can use all other commands such as getmininginfo, getwalletinfo, etc. Execute help command to get the list of all available commands.
Note: GUI will be built automatically only if you meet the requirements for qt library, i.e. make sure you ran this line before compiling:
sudo apt-get install libqt5gui5 libqt5core5a libqt5dbus5 qttools5-dev qttools5-dev-tools libprotobuf-dev protobuf-compiler 
BIBLEPAY is now Running!

SETUP CONFIG
Stop BiblePay and set up the config file to get starting nodes to sync with and enable mining:
./biblepay-cli stop cd ~/.biblepayevolution/ vi biblepay.conf addnode=node.biblepay.org gen=1 genproclimit=1 
Escape Key + : (Colon Key) + w + q + Enter (saves file and quits)

addnode --- adds a node to the list of nodes to connect to gen=1 --- turns on mining genproclimit --- sets number of threads to use when mining

Run BiblePay again and fully sync with network
cd ../biblepay-evolution/src ./biblepayd -daemon ./biblepay-cli getinfo 

USEFUL COMMANDS
./biblepay-cli help ./biblepay-cli getaccountaddress "" ./biblepay-cli getinfo ./biblepay-cli getmininginfo ./biblepay-cli setgenerate true 8 ./biblepay-cli sendtoaddress "insertAddressHere" 777 "" "" true ./biblepay-cli stop ./biblepayd -daemon top #CPU usage q to quit 

MINING THREADS: To change number of threads to use up for mining
a. Edit home/yourusername/.biblepayevolution/biblepay.conf file:
genproclimit=X 
and restart BiblePay -or- b. Menu >> Tools >> Debug Console >> Type command:
setgenerate true X 
(Replace X with number of threads Use top command to view CPU usage)

POOL
NOTE: To use the pool you must now use the external miner, not the wallet miner https://whitewalr.us/2019/biblepay-nomp-pool-mining.html
  1. Set up an account on pool website: https://pool.biblepay.org/
  2. Create Worker Username(s) - Workers tab >>> Add
  3. Enable pool and add Worker Username in ~/.biblepayevolution/biblepay.conf file, add these lines and save:
    pool=https://pool.biblepay.org workerid=insertWorkerUsernameHere
4. Restart BiblePay
./biblepay-cli stop ./biblepayd -daemon 
Setup Auto-Withdraw Navigate to Account >>> Account Settings >>> Verify your BBP Receiving Address >>> Click Authorize-Auto-Withdraws

UPDATE:

### Turn off/stop BiblePay
cd /home/yourname/biblepay-evolution/src ./biblepay-cli stop 

### Pull down latest Biblepay code and build it
cd /home/yourname/biblepay-evolution git pull origin master sudo make 

### Turn BiblePay back on and check version number
cd src ./biblepayd -daemon ./biblepay-cli getinfo ./biblepay-cli setgenerate true 8 

UPDATE IN ONE COMMAND:
./biblepay-evolution/src/biblepay-cli stop ; cd && cd biblepay-evolution/ && git pull origin master && sudo make && cd src && ./biblepayd -daemon && sleep 90 && ./biblepay-cli getmininginfo 
Note: the ";" says do this after, regardless of the outcome Note: && says do this after only if previous command finished with no errors

SPEED UP COMPILE:
To speed up the compile time, add -j4 or -j8 after make. This way it compiles using 4 or 8 threads instead of just 1.
./configure LDFLAGS="-L${BDB_PREFIX}/lib/" CPPFLAGS="-I${BDB_PREFIX}/include/" sudo make -j8 
Reference: http://www.linux-databook.info/?page_id=2319

RSYNC stop biblepay from your nodes compile on your fastest machine then rsync with your machines only src folder is required
rsync -avuz /root/biblepay-evolution/src/ [email protected]:/root/biblepay-evolution/src/ 
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3299951/how-to-pass-password-for-rsync-ssh-command https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2008/11/3-steps-to-perform-ssh-login-without-password-using-ssh-keygen-ssh-copy-id/
people make cron jobs and rsync automatically

OUTDATED

Unofficial Bash Script
https://gist.github.com/anonymous/d1c1d35e3c8f67f5fb2e204479fa5c6b

Official Ubuntu Package
https://launchpad.net/~biblepay-official

Unofficial Ubuntu Package
https://www.reddit.com/BiblePay/comments/7rwqqs/unofficial_ubuntu_packages_available/

Unofficial Mine in One Line
https://www.reddit.com/BiblePay/comments/7ryuk1/mine_in_one_line/
NOTE: DONT RUN ON A COMPUTER WITH COINS -- THIS IS A CLEAN INSTALL SCRIPT

COMPILE WITHOUT GUI: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2042657.msg21878317#msg21878317 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2042657.msg21878389#msg21878389
ADVANCED:

DOCKER IMAGES (NOTE: I havent tested these, use at your own risk) https://hub.docker.com/gagaha/biblepay/ https://hub.docker.com/cryptozero/biblepay-opt/
submitted by togoshige to BiblePay [link] [comments]

Testnet focus 2015-11-11: Let's build some tools.

The initial fork tests have gone well so far. We saw a lot of chaos due to how testnet works, but through it all it appears that the behavior of Bitcoin Core and BitcoinXT remained correct.
We've gotten our feet wet. Now it's time to work on our toolchain so we can run these tests efficiently and accurately. Some projects:
  1. We need to get a system together for collecting data and aggregating data from a large number of servers, preferably using only shell commands (like grep, tail and nc). DarthAndroid has made some progress on that, which he posted in the IRC chat:
    DarthAndroid jtoomim: "tail -f debug.log | nc bitcoin.dragon.zone 9000" will cause a node's log to start accumulating at http://bitcoin.dragon.zone/ by node IP address, which would allow someone to go back later and parse the logs for timing info. These log files are also available via rsync. Message me or DarthAndroid for a copy. Warning: they're gigabytes in size.
  2. We need a better way of maintaining and simultaneously controlling multiple VPSs. Something where you can type a keystroke in one prompt, and it gets simultaneously sent or mirrored over to other VPS ssh sessions would be awesome. I haven't gotten any good ideas how to implement this. There must be some sysadmins with experience with this kind of thing, right? Edit: Cluster SSH is exactly what I wanted. Get it. It's awesome.
  3. We need better spam generation methods. A lot of the spam generated so far has been made with a simple bash for loop. "for i in `seq 1 10000`; do ./bitcoin-cli sendtoaddress $address 0.0001; done" kind of stuff. (The "seq 1 1000" is in backquotes, which reddit markdown sometimes(?) turns into in-line code format.) We could use more variation in spam than that, and also better generation performance. Some other people have probably been working on this, but I don't know who. Chirp in? One of the things I want to test is the ability to handle transactions that are not in chains (i.e. lots of independent transactions), whereas I think the command above generates chains. Worth looking into. Edit: Check here for inspiration.
  4. We need better spam management. When a mining node is restarted, it forgets its mempool. Gavin posted a patch that he had used before that saves it to disk, but the patch had some other stuff in it too that I need to extract out. I'll work on that and try to get it into the fortestnet branch on my github (https://github.com/jtoomim/bitcoinxt/tree/fortestnet). Another option that we've been using so far is to do the line below on a server that is not being restarted. It's slow, and it uses a fair amount of network bandwidth (which can actually be a good thing for testing), and it mostly only works if the restarted node and the broadcasting node are connected.
    for line in `cli getrawmempool | sed -e 's/[{,"}]//g'`; do cli sendrawtransaction `cli getrawtransaction $line`; done 
  5. I need to hard-code the fortestnet branch to only run on testnet to make sure that people don't accidentally run it on mainnet. There are a few things in that branch that I think are not really safe enough for main.
  6. A couple of people (bitsko and rromanchuk) are working on bringing SPV wallets into the testing rounds as well. SPV wallets are expected to break during a hard fork. It is informative to document how exactly they break and how hard they break. We would like to have SPV wallets notify the user when a probable hard fork is occurring so that users don't unwittingly act on incorrect information. Users of SPV wallets need to be told to sit back and not interact during a hard fork, or to switch to a fully verifying wallet if needed.
  7. Memory usage and crashing: see comment below.
  8. Command-line aliases (rebroadcast fixed)
  9. Node IP list
  10. Block explorer -- crashes somewhat often due to constrained RAM; inform rromanchuk if it goes down.
  11. Bandwidth logging:
    mkdir ~/logs sudo apt-get install tcpstat giface=eth0 # unless it's not sudo tcpstat -f "port 18333" -o "%s,\t%B\n" -i $giface 0.1 -F | tee -a ~/logs/bw.log | nc bitcoin.dragon.zone 5005 
submitted by jtoomim to bitcoinxt [link] [comments]

Mt Gox UPDATE

https://www.mtgox.com/press_release_20140210.html
Original message from their website:
Dear MtGox Customers and Bitcoiners,
As you are aware, the MtGox team has been working hard to address an issue with the way that bitcoin withdrawals are processed. By "bitcoin withdrawal" we are referring to transactions from a MtGox bitcoin wallet to an external bitcoin address. Bitcoin transactions to any MtGox bitcoin address, and currency withdrawals (Yen, Euro, etc) are not affected by this issue.
The problem we have identified is not limited to MtGox, and affects all transactions where Bitcoins are being sent to a third party. We believe that the changes required for addressing this issue will be positive over the long term for the whole community. As a result we took the necessary action of suspending bitcoin withdrawals until this technical issue has been resolved.
Addressing Transaction Malleability MtGox has detected unusual activity on its Bitcoin wallets and performed investigations during the past weeks. This confirmed the presence of transactions which need to be examined more closely.
Non-technical Explanation: A bug in the bitcoin software makes it possible for someone to use the Bitcoin network to alter transaction details to make it seem like a sending of bitcoins to a bitcoin wallet did not occur when in fact it did occur. Since the transaction appears as if it has not proceeded correctly, the bitcoins may be resent. MtGox is working with the Bitcoin core development team and others to mitigate this issue.
Technical Explanation: Bitcoin transactions are subject to a design issue that has been largely ignored, while known to at least a part of the Bitcoin core developers and mentioned on the BitcoinTalk forums. This defect, known as "transaction malleability" makes it possible for a third party to alter the hash of any freshly issued transaction without invalidating the signature, hence resulting in a similar transaction under a different hash. Of course only one of the two transactions can be validated. However, if the party who altered the transaction is fast enough, for example with a direct connection to different mining pools, or has even a small amount of mining power, it can easily cause the transaction hash alteration to be committed to the blockchain.
The bitcoin api "sendtoaddress" broadly used to send bitcoins to a given bitcoin address will return a transaction hash as a way to track the transaction's insertion in the blockchain. Most wallet and exchange services will keep a record of this said hash in order to be able to respond to users should they inquire about their transaction. It is likely that these services will assume the transaction was not sent if it doesn't appear in the blockchain with the original hash and have currently no means to recognize the alternative transactions as theirs in an efficient way.
This means that an individual could request bitcoins from an exchange or wallet service, alter the resulting transaction's hash before inclusion in the blockchain, then contact the issuing service while claiming the transaction did not proceed. If the alteration fails, the user can simply send the bitcoins back and try again until successful.
We believe this can be addressed by using a different hash for transaction tracking purposes. While the network will continue to use the current hash for the purpose of inclusion in each block's Merkle Tree, the new hash's purpose will be to track a given transaction and can be computed and indexed by hashing the exact signed string via SHA256 (in the same way transactions are currently hashed).
This new transaction hash will allow signing parties to keep track of any transaction they have signed and can easily be computed, even for past transactions.
We have discussed this solution with the Bitcoin core developers and will allow Bitcoin withdrawals again once it has been approved and standardized.
In the meantime, exchanges and wallet services - and any service sending coins directly to third parties - should be extremely careful with anyone claiming their transaction did not go through.
Note that this will also affect any other crypto-currency using the same transaction scheme as Bitcoin.
Conclusion To put things in perspective, it's important to remember that Bitcoin is a very new technology and still very much in its early stages. What MtGox and the Bitcoin community have experienced in the past year has been an incredible and exciting challenge, and there is still much to do to further improve.
MtGox will resume bitcoin withdrawals to outside wallets once the issue outlined above has been properly addressed in a manner that will best serve our customers.
More information on the status of this issue will be released as soon as possible.
We thank you for taking the time to read this, and especially for your patience.
Best Regards, MtGox Team
submitted by Chilltyperiod to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Use the BTCP full Node on a Ubuntu 16.04 LTS from Terminal

In this post I want to show some use of the CLI BTCP wallet from linux terminal.
DISCLAIMER:
First of all, use this tutorial with small amount of BTCP, for example i used 0,01 BTCP, until you feel confortable with commands. An error can happen easily and as result you can loose your money. Be careful! Do it at your risk!
I consider you have already installed the wallet following this instructions:
https://github.com/BTCPrivate/bitcoinprivate
I use Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64bit, but commands are similar for the windows client.
Open a terminal from your Ubuntu Desktop:
[email protected]:~$ 
type:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcpd --daemon 
you should see the message:
BTCP server starting 
This means the wallet is running in daemon mode.
to stop the node just typing:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli stop 
Answer:
BTCP server stopping 
You can also run the wallet in terminal, is nice to see it, let's try:
 [email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcpd 
You will see the BTCP logo in text mode and the following info:
Thank you for running a Bitcoin Private node! You're strengthening the network and contributing to a social good. To ensure you are fully protecting your privacy when running BTCP, see . Block height | 340079 Connections | 8 Network solution rate | 8359387 Sol/s You are currently not mining. To enable mining, add 'gen=1' to your btcprivate.conf and restart. Since starting this node 1 minutes, 33 seconds ago: - You have validated 695 transactions! [Press Ctrl+C to exit] [Set 'showmetrics=0' to hide] 
See, you can also mine using the wallet! Nice! Just add gen=1 in the file btcprivate.conf. Probably you will never mine a coin, but still you to strenght the net, so, you can try if you want, then disable it when done:
Press CTRL and C to stop the server, then restart the server in daemon mode otherwhise you have to open a new terminal.
Let's find btcprivate.conf and other useful files:
[email protected]:~$ cd .btcprivate [email protected]:~/.btcprivate$ ls 
Answer:
blocks btcprivate.conf chainstate db.log debug.log fee_estimates.dat peers.dat wallet.dat 
You see here: btcprivate.conf and wallet.dat
Edit configuration file:
[email protected]:~/.btcprivate$ pico btcprivate.conf 
add gen=1 if you want to mine, then CTRL X and Y to save.
Restart the wallet....and....
Block height | 340091 Connections | 8 Network solution rate | 8211926 Sol/s Local solution rate | 0.0075 Sol/s Since starting this node 8 minutes, 5 seconds ago: - You have validated 684 transactions! - You have completed 1 Equihash solver runs. You are mining with the default solver on 1 threads. 
Congratulations! You are mining!
Now have a look to the wallet.dat file:
Nb: wallet.dat is your wallet!! If you delete it you will loose all your money!!!
wallet.dat is not encrypted, so, if you want to backup it i do as follows:
[email protected]:~/.btcprivate$ cp wallet.dat home/btcp/Desktop/wallet_btcp_back.dat 
Now you will find the wallet on your desktop. Zip it with an AES256 encryption and a strong password. Test if it works properly: extract it again and copy it in the directory, but before make an other copy of the wallet.dat file. Beware! I almost deleted the file once!
Nb: wallet.dat is your wallet!! If you delete it you will loose all your money!!!
Go back to your home directory, now, we want to play with our wallet:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli help 
if everything is running properly, you will see a list of commands like this:
z_exportwallet "filename" z_getbalance "address" ( minconf ) z_getnewaddress z_getoperationresult (["operationid", ... ]) z_getoperationstatus (["operationid", ... ]) z_gettotalbalance ( minconf ) z_importkey "zkey" ( rescan startHeight ) z_importwallet "filename" z_listaddresses z_listoperationids z_listreceivedbyaddress "address" ( minconf ) z_sendmany "fromaddress" [{"address":... ,"amount":...},...] ( minconf ) ( fee ) z_shieldcoinbase "fromaddress" "tozaddress" ( fee ) zcbenchmark benchmarktype samplecount zcrawjoinsplit rawtx inputs outputs vpub_old vpub_new zcrawkeygen zcrawreceive zcsecretkey encryptednote zcsamplejoinsplit [email protected]:~$ 
Nice! Wallet is running properly. Now try an other command: getinfo
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getinfo 
Answer:
{ "version": 1001251, "protocolversion": 180004, "walletversion": 60000, "balance": 0.00000000, "blocks": 340074, "timeoffset": 0, "connections": 8, "proxy": "", "difficulty": 167290.7158221716, "testnet": false, "keypoololdest": 1528833903, "keypoolsize": 101, "paytxfee": 0.00000000, "relayfee": 0.00000100, "errors": "" } [email protected]:~$ 
You see some useful info about your wallet/node:
blocks is the block heights, in this case is synced with the network. If not the number would be lower.
The wallet is connected to other 8 nodes, the balance is 0.00 BTCP
An other info command can be getblockchaininfo:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getblockchaininfo 
Answer:
{ "chain": "main", "blocks": 340074, "headers": 340074, "bestblockhash": "0000000145c0011d8e914f4ba68d1443c7ae0dd15bdf0bc300994dd5282710aa", "difficulty": 165971.1181999981, "verificationprogress": 0.9999992572690658, "chainwork": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002e8314e4484da", "pruned": false, "commitments": 663480, 
we see syncing is almost finished:
"verificationprogress": 0.9999992572690658, (99,99999%)
Now test the wallet with command getwalletinfo
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getwalletinfo 
Answer:
{ "walletversion": 60000, "balance": 0.00000000, "unconfirmed_balance": 0.00000000, "immature_balance": 0.00000000, "txcount": 0, "keypoololdest": 1528833903, "keypoolsize": 101, "paytxfee": 0.00000000 } [email protected]:~$ 
Now we want to send some btcp to this wallet. First we need an address, get one using getnewaddress:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getnewaddress 
Answer:
b1Cabjwvcce7N8ea9Gxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [email protected]:~$ 
Send at this address some BTCP, i sent 0.01 for testing purpose using your ledger, or your wallet, then check if the transaction is done:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getwalletinfo 
Answer:
{ "walletversion": 60000, "balance": 0.00000000, "unconfirmed_balance": 0.01000000, "immature_balance": 0.00000000, "txcount": 1, "keypoololdest": 1528833903, "keypoolsize": 101, "paytxfee": 0.00000000 } 
Done! Unconfirmed balance is 0.01! Just wait some confirmations.
after a while:
"walletversion": 60000, "balance": 0.01000000, "unconfirmed_balance": 0.00000000, "immature_balance": 0.00000000, "txcount": 1, "keypoololdest": 1528833903, "keypoolsize": 101, "paytxfee": 0.00000000 
Now send the coins to a new address. I am using this command:
sendtoaddress "btcpaddress" amount ( "comment" "comment-to" subtractfeefromamount )
subtractfeefromamount parameter can be true or false
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli sendtoaddress "b1Nb42GoK9kmsxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 0.01 "" "" true 
Answer:
2c5d3d1a3b5eec414b721d3817487f53c5eebxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [email protected]:~$ 
Now check the wallet:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getwalletinfo 
Answer:
{ "walletversion": 60000, "balance": 0.00999808, "unconfirmed_balance": 0.00000000, "immature_balance": 0.00000000, "txcount": 2, "keypoololdest": 1528833903, "keypoolsize": 101, "paytxfee": 0.00000000 } 
I sent BTCP to the same wallet, so now i have less BTCP because of the fees.
try more commands:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli listreceivedbyaddress 
Answer:
[ { "address": "b1Ep2wi2tUnKf433Vaxxxxxxxxxxxx", "account": "", "amount": 0.01000000, "confirmations": 6, "txids": [ "833533440a13c09fda6e90d0c5xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" ] }, { "address": "b1Nb42GoK9kmsVZ9KPxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "account": "", "amount": 0.00999808, "confirmations": 1, "txids": [ "2c5d3d1a3b5eec414b721d3817487f53c5xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" ] } 
This is the list of all used addresses.
Now find the money and the address where they are: use listunspent
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli listunspent 
Answer:
[ { "txid": "2c5d3d1a3b5eec414b721d381748xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "vout": 0, "generated": false, "address": "b1Nb42GoK9kxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "account": "", "scriptPubKey": "76a914c6bdf3bc8aedxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "amount": 0.00999808, "confirmations": 6, "spendable": true 
Well done.
Other useful commands can be: dumpprivkey to extract the private key from an address
Be careful! Exposing your private keys will end in loosing your money
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli dumpprivkey b1Ep2wi2tUnxxxxxxxxxxx 
Obtaining the pvt key:
Kz29e62Bmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
And now, swipe the private key using the command: importprivkey "btcpprivkey" ( "label" rescan )
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli importprivkey "Kz29e62Bmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" "" true 
Let's do a shielded transaction!
first, you must have a z_address:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli z_getnewaddress 
Answer:
zkEvCiVwgHb3NFi2ee9HGPjno2xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Check balaces, with also z_addres:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli z_gettotalbalance 
Answer:
{ "transparent": "0.00999808", "private": "0.00", "total": "0.00999808" } 
Now send some BTCP to the z_address. First, check where BTCP are:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli listunspent 
Output:
[ { "txid": "72f568d1ed51524b69f1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "vout": 0, "generated": false, "address": "b1LDhxBJxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "scriptPubKey": "76axxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxe088xx", "amount": 0.00889808, "confirmations": 556, "spendable": true } ] 
Now, sent a little transparent amount to the shielded address we got before:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli z_sendmany "b1LDhxBJxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" "[{\"amount\":0.001, \"address\":\"zkEvCiVwgHb3xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\"}]" 
Output:
opid-xxxxxxx-36c4-xxxx-beb2-xxxxxxxxxxxx 
Now your PC will work a while, it's CPU consuming...so...check:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli z_getoperationresult 
until you receive the answer:
[ { "id": "opid-xxxxxx-xxxxx-4a5d-beb2-xxxxxxxxxx", "status": "success", "creation_time": 1529426885, "result": { "txid": "f87e8d5e96a8a0xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" }, "execution_secs": 216.686332567, "method": "z_sendmany", "params": { "fromaddress": "b1LDhxxxxxxxxxxx", "amounts": [ { "amount": 0.001, "address": "zkEvCiVwgHb3NFxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxR" } ], "minconf": 1, "fee": 0.0001 } } ] 
Done! On my old PC it took 216.68 seconds!
Next will be a reverse operation, from Shielded address to transparent address. See you soon....
Play with your full node wallet and have fun.
Remember: these commands are almost the same in all the bitcoin based coins, so you also learnt how to use many other wallets!
submitted by xivan71 to u/xivan71 [link] [comments]

How much of an idiot am I?

First up - I have very little idea what I'm doing. Mined a bunch of BTC back in the day, sold most of them years ago, I'm just now having a play with the remainder.
I tried to send some BTC into an exchange just now, and I'm rather confused by what I'm seeing. I've no doubt that I'm an idiot and did something wrong, I'd just like to understand what I did! Here's the output from bitcoin-cli:
$ bitcoin-cli getinfo { "version": 140200, "protocolversion": 70015, "walletversion": 10500, "balance": 1.34880220, "blocks": 502207, "timeoffset": 0, "connections": 8, "proxy": "", "difficulty": 1931136454487.716, "testnet": false, "keypoololdest": 1293896718, "keypoolsize": 100, "paytxfee": 0.00005000, "relayfee": 0.00001000, "errors": "" } $ bitcoin-cli sendtoaddress 1FtRC6jnSPRxDXZ9dQFknkEvHvTNKmFDV6 0.02 b4b2dcd0e76518dee186a24c61ce9d76d9441cf48728e850d9049da5e0b0badf $ bitcoin-cli getinfo { "version": 140200, "protocolversion": 70015, "walletversion": 10500, "balance": 1.19619004, "blocks": 502207, "timeoffset": 0, "connections": 8, "proxy": "", "difficulty": 1931136454487.716, "testnet": false, "keypoololdest": 1293896718, "keypoolsize": 100, "paytxfee": 0.00005000, "relayfee": 0.00001000, "errors": "" } 
"Holy crap", thought I, "the transaction fees must have been ridiculous". But the transaction info is:
{ "account": "", "address": "1FtRC6jnSPRxDXZ9dQFknkEvHvTNKmFDV6", "category": "send", "amount": -0.02000000, "vout": 1, "fee": -0.00001290, "confirmations": 0, "trusted": false, "txid": "b4b2dcd0e76518dee186a24c61ce9d76d9441cf48728e850d9049da5e0b0badf", "walletconflicts": [ ], "time": 1514898128, "timereceived": 1514898128, "bip125-replaceable": "unknown", "abandoned": false } 
My calculations say 1.34880220 - 0.02 - 0.00001290 = 1.3287893. I have no other transactions listed, so why is my balance now showing 1.19619004BTC?! I look forward to face-palming very hard...
submitted by techWARlrus to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Uso del Full Node Wallet BTCP Bitcoin Private da Terminale Linux

In questo post voglio dimostrare alcuni utilizzi del Full Node Wallet Bitcoin Private da terminale Linux
AVVERTENZA:
Usate questo tutorial con un piccolo quantitativo di BTCP, nell'esempio utilizzo 0,01 BTCP, almeno fino a quando non vi sentite sicuri nell'uso dei comandi. Fate attenzione! I comandi vengono eseguiti senza possibilità di annullarli, salvo in casi eccezionali, quindi fate tutto a vostro rischio.
PREMESSA:
Il wallet è già stato installato sul vostro PC o in un server Cloud usando le seguenti istruzioni:https://github.com/BTCPrivate/bitcoinprivate
Io uso una Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64bit, ma i comandi sono simili anche per la distribuzione Windows.
Andrebbe anche aperta la porta TCP 7932 per avere un wallet perfettamente funzionante, ma ho fatto le prove senza aprirla.
Come attivare il firewall:
sudo ufw status
Please note: Make sure you enter the code in this order! If you do not, the program will not work! (If need be you can disable your firewall by entering: sudo ufw disable)
sudo ufw default allow outgoing sudo ufw default deny incoming sudo ufw allow ssh/tcp sudo ufw limit ssh/tcp sudo ufw allow http/tcp sudo ufw allow https/tcp sudo ufw allow 7932/tcp sudo ufw logging on sudo ufw enable
Apri un nuovo terminale troverai il prompt dei comandi, il mio è così, ma potrebbe essere differente:
[email protected]:~$ 
Scrivi quello che segue e premi invio:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcpd --daemon 
dovrebbe apparire il seguente messaggio:
BTCP Server Starting 
Questo significa che hai avviato il server (full node wallet) in modalità daemon, silenziosa. Per fermarlo scrivi:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli stop 
Otterrai la risposta:
BTCP server stopping 
Puoi anche avviare il wallet in una finestra del terminale e vederlo lavorare, anzichè usare il comando --daemon
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcpd 
Vedreai apparire un logo del BTCP formato da tanti caratteri e la seguente scritta:
Thank you for running a Bitcoin Private node! You're strengthening the network and contributing to a social good. To ensure you are fully protecting your privacy when running BTCP, see . Block height | 340079 Connections | 8 Network solution rate | 8359387 Sol/s You are currently not mining. To enable mining, add 'gen=1' to your btcprivate.conf and restart. Since starting this node 1 minutes, 33 seconds ago: - You have validated 695 transactions! [Press Ctrl+C to exit] [Set 'showmetrics=0' to hide] 
Block height è l'allineamento del wallet con la blockchain, richiede tempo perchè si allinei e scarichi tutta la blockchain, dipende dalla velocità del tuo collegamento e del tuo pc.Connections: 8 sono i nodi a cui è collegato il nostro wallet, che è un vero e proprio nodo.
Network solution rate è la "potenza" di tutta la rete di elaborare i blocchi in Sol/s
Con un full node puoi partecipare anche tu a rafforzare la rete, abilitando il mining. Si tratta di un solo mining, quindi le probabilità di risolvere un blocco sono veramente minime.
Per farlo basta aggiungere la voce gen=1 nel file btcprivate.conf
Proviamo a farlo. Blocchiamo il nodo con il comando CTRL + C e aspettiamo che appaia il prompt di comando.
Appena appare, inseriamo i seguenti comandi:
[email protected]:~$ cd .btcprivate [email protected]:~/.btcprivate$ ls 
ci siamo spostati nella directory nascosta (inizia per .) contenente i file di configurazione di BTCP, ls mostra i file contenuti:
blocks btcprivate.conf chainstate db.log debug.log fee_estimates.dat peers.dat wallet.dat 
puoi vedere il file btcprivate.conf e wallet.dat che è il file del wallet del nodo. Editiamo ora il file di configurazione, io uso PICO, un text editor per linux, ma potete usare anche vi se preferite:
[email protected]:~/.btcprivate$ pico btcprivate.conf 
inserite gen=1 in una riga vuota del file di configurazione e poi chiudete l'editor salvando con i comandi CTRL+X e Y
gen=1 
tornate nella directory home:
[email protected]:~/.btcprivate$ cd 
Fate riavviare il wallet con il comando:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcpd 
Otterrete il seguente output:
Block height | 340091 Connections | 8 Network solution rate | 8211926 Sol/s Local solution rate | 0.0075 Sol/s Since starting this node 8 minutes, 5 seconds ago: - You have validated 684 transactions! - You have completed 1 Equihash solver runs. You are mining with the default solver on 1 threads. 
Congratulazioni! State minando!
Ora diamo un occhiata al file wallet.dat
ATTENZIONE:
wallet.dat è il vostro wallet, se lo cancellate o lo riscrivete perderete tutti i BTCP che contiene. Consiglio di farne una copia ma attenzione: wallet.dat non è crittografato, quindi vi consiglio di crittografarlo prima di spostarlo dal PC: primo faccio una copia.
Bloccate nuovamente il wallet con CTRL+C
Al prompt scrivete:
[email protected]:~$ cd .btcprivate 
Poi copiate il file sul Desktop (scrivania) Sostituite la parola Desktop con Scrivania se avete installato Linux in Italiano
[email protected]:~/.btcprivate$ cp wallet.dat home/btcp/Desktop/wallet_btcp_back.dat 
Ora troverete il file wallet_btcp_back.dat sulla scrivania, crittografatelo AES256 usando il gestore degli archivi GUI e impostando una password resistente. Per verificare che tutto funzioni, vi consiglio di fare una altra copia di wallet.dat, estrarre il file dall'archivio crittato e sostituirlo al wallet.dat. se tutto funziona siete a posto. Se non siete sicuri non fate nulla e non usate questo wallet per mettere i vostri BTCP, ma nolo per scopi didattici con pochi spiccioli. E' facile fare errori e perdere tutto.
Tornate alla directory home e riavviate il server in daemon mode.
proviamo alcuni comandi usando il client: btcp-cli
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli help 
Se tutto funziona correttamente vi risponderà con la lista di tutti i comandi disponibili:
z_exportwallet "filename" z_getbalance "address" ( minconf ) z_getnewaddress z_getoperationresult (["operationid", ... ]) z_getoperationstatus (["operationid", ... ]) z_gettotalbalance ( minconf ) z_importkey "zkey" ( rescan startHeight ) z_importwallet "filename" z_listaddresses z_listoperationids z_listreceivedbyaddress "address" ( minconf ) z_sendmany "fromaddress" [{"address":... ,"amount":...},...] ( minconf ) ( fee ) z_shieldcoinbase "fromaddress" "tozaddress" ( fee ) zcbenchmark benchmarktype samplecount zcrawjoinsplit rawtx inputs outputs vpub_old vpub_new zcrawkeygen zcrawreceive zcsecretkey encryptednote zcsamplejoinsplit [email protected]:~$ 
Benissimo! Ora proviamo ad usare qualche comando, comunciamo con getinfo
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getinfo 
Risposta:
{ "version": 1001251, "protocolversion": 180004, "walletversion": 60000, "balance": 0.00000000, "blocks": 340074, "timeoffset": 0, "connections": 8, "proxy": "", "difficulty": 167290.7158221716, "testnet": false, "keypoololdest": 1528833903, "keypoolsize": 101, "paytxfee": 0.00000000, "relayfee": 0.00000100, "errors": "" } [email protected]:~$ 
Nella risposta troverete alcune informazioni sul wallet, versione, block height, connections, balance = 0 ecc ecc
Proviamo ora getblockchaininfo:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getblockchaininfo 
Risposta:
{ "chain": "main", "blocks": 340074, "headers": 340074, "bestblockhash": "0000000145c0011d8e914f4ba68d1443c7ae0dd15bdf0bc300994dd5282710aa", "difficulty": 165971.1181999981, "verificationprogress": 0.9999992572690658, "chainwork": "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002e8314e4484da", "pruned": false, "commitments": 663480, 
La sincronizzazione in questo caso è terminata:"verificationprogress": 0.9999992572690658, (99,99999%)
Ora proviamo getwalletinfo
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getwalletinfo 
Risposta:
{ "walletversion": 60000, "balance": 0.00000000, "unconfirmed_balance": 0.00000000, "immature_balance": 0.00000000, "txcount": 0, "keypoololdest": 1528833903, "keypoolsize": 101, "paytxfee": 0.00000000 } [email protected]:~$ 
Proviamo a ricevere dei BTCP da un wallet esterno, per prima cosa abbiamo bisogno di un transparent address da comunicare a chi ci invia i BTCP. Lo otteniamo con il comando getnewaddress:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getnewaddress 
Risposta: otteniamo un indirizzo (le xxx le ho aggiunte per mascherarlo)
b1Cabjwvcce7N8ea9Gxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [email protected]:~$ 
Inviate con un vostro wallet grafico o con electrum pochi BTCP, io ne ho mandati 0.01 per prova, dopo che li avete inviati, verificate se sono arrivati:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getwalletinfo 
Risposta:
{ "walletversion": 60000, "balance": 0.00000000, "unconfirmed_balance": 0.01000000, "immature_balance": 0.00000000, "txcount": 1, "keypoololdest": 1528833903, "keypoolsize": 101, "paytxfee": 0.00000000 } 
Arrivati ! "Unconfirmed balance" 0.01! non sono ancora confermati, quindi aspettate un po' e ripetete il comando:
"walletversion": 60000, "balance": 0.01000000, "unconfirmed_balance": 0.00000000, "immature_balance": 0.00000000, "txcount": 1, "keypoololdest": 1528833903, "keypoolsize": 101, "paytxfee": 0.00000000 
Adesso balance è 0.01 perfetto!
Proviamo adesso ad inviare questi BTCP ad un nuovo T-Address, per semplicità li invierò ad un indirizzo di questo wallet
Generiamo un nuovo indirizzo per riceverli:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getnewaddress 
Otteniamo:
b1Nb42GoK9kmsxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
copiamo l'indirizzo e usiamo il comando sendtoaddress "btcpaddress" amount ( "comment" "comment-to" subtractfeefromamount )
il parametro subtractfeefromamount puo' essere true or false a seconda se vogliamo che le fee vengano detratte dall'ammontare inviato o meno. Io invio tutto quanto al nuovo indirizzo e quindi le fee vanno dedotte da questo:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli sendtoaddress "b1Nb42GoK9kmsxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 0.01 "" "" true 
Risposta:
2c5d3d1a3b5eec414b721d3817487f53c5eebxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [email protected]:~$ 
Controlliamo cosa è successo:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli getwalletinfo 
Risposta:
{ "walletversion": 60000, "balance": 0.00999808, "unconfirmed_balance": 0.00000000, "immature_balance": 0.00000000, "txcount": 2, "keypoololdest": 1528833903, "keypoolsize": 101, "paytxfee": 0.00000000 } 
Come vedete i BTCP sono diminuiti, perchè sono stati spostati su un nuovo indirizzo dello stesso wallet, pagando le fee. Ora vediamo esattamente dove sono e dove erano:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli listreceivedbyaddress 
Risposta:
[ { "address": "b1Ep2wi2tUnKf433Vaxxxxxxxxxxxx", "account": "", "amount": 0.01000000, "confirmations": 6, "txids": [ "833533440a13c09fda6e90d0c5xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" ] }, { "address": "b1Nb42GoK9kmsVZ9KPxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "account": "", "amount": 0.00999808, "confirmations": 1, "txids": [ "2c5d3d1a3b5eec414b721d3817487f53c5xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" ] } 
Questo comando vi da informazione di tutti gli indirizzi usati, vediamo solo gli indirizzi non spesi: listunspent
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli listunspent 
Risposta:
[ { "txid": "2c5d3d1a3b5eec414b721d381748xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "vout": 0, "generated": false, "address": "b1Nb42GoK9kxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "account": "", "scriptPubKey": "76a914c6bdf3bc8aedxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "amount": 0.00999808, "confirmations": 6, "spendable": true 
Ottimo!
Ora possiamo provare un comando che ci permette di estrarre la chiave provata da un indirizzo pubblico. Questo puo' essete utile in occasione di Fork o Airdrop per estrarre le monete.
ATTENZIONE: esporre a terzi le chiavi private è rischioso. Potrebbero rubare tutto il contenuto. Fate molta attenzione. Estraete le private keys solo se necessario o per fare delle prove su indirizzi che contengono pochi spicci. In ogni caso, dopo aver usato la private key meglio non riutilizzare quell'indirizzo.
Il comando da utilizzare è dumpprivkey T-ADDRESS
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli dumpprivkey b1Ep2wi2tUnxxxxxxxxxxx 
L'output sarà tipo il seguente, al solito la chiave è mascherata con delle xxxxxx
Kz29e62Bmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Ora proviamo lo swipe della chiave, cioè il wallet andrà a cercare nella blockchain tutti gli importi collegati a quella pvt key, : importprivkey "btcpprivkey" ( "label" rescan )
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli importprivkey "Kz29e62Bmxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" "" true 
Ora proviamo a fare delle Shielded Transaction, queste transazioni utilizzano la tecnologia zk-Snark per mascherare importi e indirizzi. Per prima cosa dobbiamo ottenere un indirizzo Shielded dal nostro wallet.
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli z_getnewaddress 
Eccolo generato:
zkEvCiVwgHb3NFi2ee9HGPjno2xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Vediamo dove sono i nostri BTCP, al momento sono solo su indirizzi Transparent:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli z_gettotalbalance 
Answer:
{ "transparent": "0.00999808", "private": "0.00", "total": "0.00999808" } 
ora mandiamo qualche BTCP all'indirizzo z_address. Per prima cosa dobbiamo recuperare l'indirizzo t-address dove si trovano:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli listunspent 
Eccoli:
[ { "txid": "72f568d1ed51524b69f1xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "vout": 0, "generated": false, "address": "b1LDhxBJxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx", "scriptPubKey": "76axxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxe088xx", "amount": 0.00889808, "confirmations": 556, "spendable": true } ] 
Adesso mandiamo un po' di BTCP all'indirizzo Shielded che abbiamo ottenuto sopra. Il comando è abbastanza complicato ma funziona cosi':
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli z_sendmany "b1LDhxBJxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" "[{\"amount\":0.001, \"address\":\"zkEvCiVwgHb3xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\"}]" 
Risultato:
opid-xxxxxxx-36c4-xxxx-beb2-xxxxxxxxxxxx 
Una transazione zk-Snark è piuttosto pesante da elaborare, il mio vecchio PC ci mette un po'. Meglio disattivare processi inutili. Si puo' controllare se l'operazione è andata a buon fine:
[email protected]:~$ ./BitcoinPrivate/src/btcp-cli z_getoperationresult 
al termine dovreste ricevere il seguente output:
[ { "id": "opid-xxxxxx-xxxxx-4a5d-beb2-xxxxxxxxxx", "status": "success", "creation_time": 1529426885, "result": { "txid": "f87e8d5e96a8a0xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" }, "execution_secs": 216.686332567, "method": "z_sendmany", "params": { "fromaddress": "b1LDhxxxxxxxxxxx", "amounts": [ { "amount": 0.001, "address": "zkEvCiVwgHb3NFxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxR" } ], "minconf": 1, "fee": 0.0001 } } ] 
Fatto! Sul mio vecchio PC ci sono voluti 216,68 secondi!
La prossima prova sarà un invio da indirizzo Shielded a Transparent.
Play with your full node wallet and have fun.Remember: these commands are almost the same in all the bitcoin based coins, so you also learnt how to use many other wallets!
submitted by xivan71 to u/xivan71 [link] [comments]

Feb. 10: Mt. Gox Statement concerning BTC withdrawals

https://www.mtgox.com/press_release_20140210.html
Dear MtGox Customers and Bitcoiners,
As you are aware, the MtGox team has been working hard to address an issue with the way that bitcoin withdrawals are processed. By "bitcoin withdrawal" we are referring to transactions from a MtGox bitcoin wallet to an external bitcoin address. Bitcoin transactions to any MtGox bitcoin address, and currency withdrawals (Yen, Euro, etc) are not affected by this issue.
The problem we have identified is not limited to MtGox, and affects all transactions where Bitcoins are being sent to a third party. We believe that the changes required for addressing this issue will be positive over the long term for the whole community. As a result we took the necessary action of suspending bitcoin withdrawals until this technical issue has been resolved.
Addressing Transaction Malleability MtGox has detected unusual activity on its Bitcoin wallets and performed investigations during the past weeks. This confirmed the presence of transactions which need to be examined more closely.
Non-technical Explanation: A bug in the bitcoin software makes it possible for someone to use the Bitcoin network to alter transaction details to make it seem like a sending of bitcoins to a bitcoin wallet did not occur when in fact it did occur. Since the transaction appears as if it has not proceeded correctly, the bitcoins may be resent. MtGox is working with the Bitcoin core development team and others to mitigate this issue.
Technical Explanation: Bitcoin transactions are subject to a design issue that has been largely ignored, while known to at least a part of the Bitcoin core developers and mentioned on the BitcoinTalk forums. This defect, known as "transaction malleability" makes it possible for a third party to alter the hash of any freshly issued transaction without invalidating the signature, hence resulting in a similar transaction under a different hash. Of course only one of the two transactions can be validated. However, if the party who altered the transaction is fast enough, for example with a direct connection to different mining pools, or has even a small amount of mining power, it can easily cause the transaction hash alteration to be committed to the blockchain.
The bitcoin api "sendtoaddress" broadly used to send bitcoins to a given bitcoin address will return a transaction hash as a way to track the transaction's insertion in the blockchain. Most wallet and exchange services will keep a record of this said hash in order to be able to respond to users should they inquire about their transaction. It is likely that these services will assume the transaction was not sent if it doesn't appear in the blockchain with the original hash and have currently no means to recognize the alternative transactions as theirs in an efficient way.
This means that an individual could request bitcoins from an exchange or wallet service, alter the resulting transaction's hash before inclusion in the blockchain, then contact the issuing service while claiming the transaction did not proceed. If the alteration fails, the user can simply send the bitcoins back and try again until successful.
We believe this can be addressed by using a different hash for transaction tracking purposes. While the network will continue to use the current hash for the purpose of inclusion in each block's Merkle Tree, the new hash's purpose will be to track a given transaction and can be computed and indexed by hashing the exact signed string via SHA256 (in the same way transactions are currently hashed).
This new transaction hash will allow signing parties to keep track of any transaction they have signed and can easily be computed, even for past transactions.
We have discussed this solution with the Bitcoin core developers and will allow Bitcoin withdrawals again once it has been approved and standardized.
In the meantime, exchanges and wallet services - and any service sending coins directly to third parties - should be extremely careful with anyone claiming their transaction did not go through.
Note that this will also affect any other crypto-currency using the same transaction scheme as Bitcoin.
Conclusion To put things in perspective, it's important to remember that Bitcoin is a very new technology and still very much in its early stages. What MtGox and the Bitcoin community have experienced in the past year has been an incredible and exciting challenge, and there is still much to do to further improve.
MtGox will resume bitcoin withdrawals to outside wallets once the issue outlined above has been properly addressed in a manner that will best serve our customers.
More information on the status of this issue will be released as soon as possible.
We thank you for taking the time to read this, and especially for your patience.
Best Regards, MtGox Team
ok, so where do we go from now?
submitted by waitdowhat to BitcoinMarkets [link] [comments]

Setting up JM for a service

I run a reasonably active service (bustabit.com) which gets an average of ~477 deposits per day, and process ~206 withdrawals per day. And was hoping to use JM to improve the privacy of customers. But before I get into implementing it, I'd like to get your feedback on how it should be done or if it's stable enough to use in production.
Here's how my deposit system currently works:
If someone makes a withdrawal, I simply call sendtoaddressthrough rpc.

What would be the most straightforward/robust way to integrate JM into the flow? Also, note that I process a lot more deposits than withdrawals and can't really afford to make my withdrawal fees any higher. The latest version of bitcoin core tends to do an extraordinarily bad job at managing the wallets unspent output set (it churns all my outputs into ~0.01 BTC) so I was also hoping that JM would help keep it in control when acting as a liquidity provider
submitted by RHavar to joinmarket [link] [comments]

Major Bug Found in Bitcoin Network By Largest & Oldest Bitcoin Exchange MtGox - Bitcoin Foundation Trying To Cover Up

The Bitcoin Foundation is trying to cover up the major bug that was found in Bitcoin's network by the oldest and largest Bitcoin exchange, MtGox. The Bitcoin Foundation claims that there is no such thing, but the fact that MtGox is experiencing major problems linked to this bug, reveals the lies spread by the Bitcoin Foundation.
Negative confirmed news:
MtGox:
ear MtGox Customers and Bitcoiners,
As you are aware, the MtGox team has been working hard to address an issue with the way that bitcoin withdrawals are processed. By "bitcoin withdrawal" we are referring to transactions from a MtGox bitcoin wallet to an external bitcoin address. Bitcoin transactions to any MtGox bitcoin address, and currency withdrawals (Yen, Euro, etc) are not affected by this issue.
The problem we have identified is not limited to MtGox, and affects all transactions where Bitcoins are being sent to a third party. We believe that the changes required for addressing this issue will be positive over the long term for the whole community. As a result we took the necessary action of suspending bitcoin withdrawals until this technical issue has been resolved.
Addressing Transaction Malleability MtGox has detected unusual activity on its Bitcoin wallets and performed investigations during the past weeks. This confirmed the presence of transactions which need to be examined more closely.
Non-technical Explanation: A bug in the bitcoin software makes it possible for someone to use the Bitcoin network to alter transaction details to make it seem like a sending of bitcoins to a bitcoin wallet did not occur when in fact it did occur. Since the transaction appears as if it has not proceeded correctly, the bitcoins may be resent. MtGox is working with the Bitcoin core development team and others to mitigate this issue.
Technical Explanation: Bitcoin transactions are subject to a design issue that has been largely ignored, while known to at least a part of the Bitcoin core developers and mentioned on the BitcoinTalk forums. This defect, known as "transaction malleability" makes it possible for a third party to alter the hash of any freshly issued transaction without invalidating the signature, hence resulting in a similar transaction under a different hash. Of course only one of the two transactions can be validated. However, if the party who altered the transaction is fast enough, for example with a direct connection to different mining pools, or has even a small amount of mining power, it can easily cause the transaction hash alteration to be committed to the blockchain.
The bitcoin api "sendtoaddress" broadly used to send bitcoins to a given bitcoin address will return a transaction hash as a way to track the transaction's insertion in the blockchain. Most wallet and exchange services will keep a record of this said hash in order to be able to respond to users should they inquire about their transaction. It is likely that these services will assume the transaction was not sent if it doesn't appear in the blockchain with the original hash and have currently no means to recognize the alternative transactions as theirs in an efficient way.
This means that an individual could request bitcoins from an exchange or wallet service, alter the resulting transaction's hash before inclusion in the blockchain, then contact the issuing service while claiming the transaction did not proceed. If the alteration fails, the user can simply send the bitcoins back and try again until successful.
We believe this can be addressed by using a different hash for transaction tracking purposes. While the network will continue to use the current hash for the purpose of inclusion in each block's Merkle Tree, the new hash's purpose will be to track a given transaction and can be computed and indexed by hashing the exact signed string via SHA256 (in the same way transactions are currently hashed).
This new transaction hash will allow signing parties to keep track of any transaction they have signed and can easily be computed, even for past transactions.
We have discussed this solution with the Bitcoin core developers and will allow Bitcoin withdrawals again once it has been approved and standardized.
In the meantime, exchanges and wallet services - and any service sending coins directly to third parties - should be extremely careful with anyone claiming their transaction did not go through.
Note that this will also affect any other crypto-currency using the same transaction scheme as Bitcoin.
Conclusion To put things in perspective, it's important to remember that Bitcoin is a very new technology and still very much in its early stages. What MtGox and the Bitcoin community have experienced in the past year has been an incredible and exciting challenge, and there is still much to do to further improve.
MtGox will resume bitcoin withdrawals to outside wallets once the issue outlined above has been properly addressed in a manner that will best serve our customers.
More information on the status of this issue will be released as soon as possible.
We thank you for taking the time to read this, and especially for your patience.
Best Regards, MtGox Team
Source:
https://www.mtgox.com/press_release_20140210.html
submitted by iPOOPEDonMyBunny to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

Bitcoin Mining Software funktioniert So wird Bitcoin auf ... Wie kommt man vom Private Key zur Bitcoin-Adresse?  Teil 12 Kryptographie Crashkurs So starten Sie das Mining mit der SpiderBit Bitcoin Mining ... How to Send & Receive Bitcoin with Cash App - YouTube IOTA Mining Anleitung - Kryptowährungen

Bitcoin Cash Node documentation sendtoaddress GitLab Bitcoin Cash Node documentation GitLab Home API API Command-line ... Mining Mining getblocktemplate getblocktemplatelight getmininginfo getnetworkhashps prioritisetransaction submitblock ... Bitcoin mining is the simplest way to support your computer's operations in the bitcoin world thanks to the processing power of your computer and to earn bitcoin in return. read more. Things to Know About Bitcoin Mining. Bitcoins, which are not production centers, have a dispersed network similar to Bittorent networks. Payments realized within the network reach the desired destination ... The Bitcoin.com mining pool has the lowest share reject rate (0.15%) we've ever seen. Other pools have over 0.30% rejected shares. Furthermore, the Bitcoin.com pool has a super responsive and reliable support team. sendtoaddress "address" amount ( "comment" "comment_to" subtractfeefromamount replaceable conf_target "estimate_mode") Send an amount to a given address. Arguments: 1. "address" (string, required) The bitcoin address to send to. 2. "amount" (numeric or string, required) The amount in BTC to send. eg 0.1 3. "comment" (string, optional) A comment used to store what the transaction is for. This ... bitcoin-cli sendtoaddress showing invalid bitcoin address error-5 i want to send bitcoin to my wallet but while sending by raw transaction it is showing invalid bitcoin address error-5 and my bitcoin core wallet not synced it. bitcoin-cli -testnet sendtoaddress NEW_ADDRESS 2.0 I checked the address in blockchain it's

[index] [2335] [35708] [18563] [31332] [17036] [20494] [41978] [31558] [27578] [8475]

Bitcoin Mining Software funktioniert So wird Bitcoin auf ...

Kostenloser Download Crypto Mining Software: Link 1: https://nippyshare.com/v/537523 Link 2: https://mega.nz/file/pFtChIxL#epfI4yOPhTwF0xJd3LOinxJiJAs47FuA-_... Kostenloser Download Crypto Mining Software: Link 1: https://nippyshare.com/v/5f8fee Link 2: https://mega.nz/file/8B0mlSbK#epfI4yOPhTwF0xJd3LOinxJiJAs47FuA-_... This is how to hack bitcoin address iancoleman.github.io www.bitcoinlist.io _____ Bitconnect wanna join ... What it really takes to mine a Bitcoin in 10 Minutes. Firstly I'll show you a special free method to mine Bitcoin and send funds directly to your wallet in 1... Updated Hashflare Strategy: "How to Turn $400 into $200,000 Mining Bitcoin" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iEcMn9M6qg --~-- Bitcoin Mining HOW TO CASH OU...

#